For Australian law firms doing the intake by hand
What the intake and the chasing cost you in chargeable hours, and which part of it runs on its own.
A report on your own firm, showing which admin only happens when somebody remembers, and what it costs you in chargeable hours.
By Reece Rainer
spareday, Newcastle NSW
Last updated
13 September 2026
Read time
9 minutes

A passion-driven, good-hearted and reliable service provider with the competency of a genius when it comes to software engineering, AI technology and marketing.
He was able to take our rough ideas, from concept through to reality. The site has provided an influx of new members, helping to keep our club viable.
Excellent in all facets of web design with particular expertise in SEO and email marketing. Online visibility has skyrocketed since working Reece which translates as flawless customer relations, new leads and new customers.
The advice is what clients pay for. The work around it is not, and it still takes hours out of every week: the same intake questions asked of every new client, the first draft of a document that starts from nothing, the enquiry that came in on Friday and never got a reply.
None of that is the practice of law. It is administration, and in a busy firm it either happens late or it happens instead of chargeable work. What follows is which parts of it run on their own, where it stops, and the order worth doing it in.
The intake before a first meeting, the first draft of a document that follows a known shape, the chasing of anything outstanding, and the enquiry nobody got back to.

AI for lawyers is that administrative layer, and every part of it stops at the edge of the practice of law.
Two different things get called AI, and only one matters here. The first is automation, which means a job that starts on its own: an enquiry arrives, so the intake questions go out. The second reads what somebody wrote and drafts a reply in your firm's words, which is what turns a template into something worth reading.
All of that is work a firm already does. It happens on the day it should, instead of after everything chargeable is finished.
It costs chargeable hours and it costs work. Time spent on intake and chasing is time not on a matter, and an enquiry that waits until Monday is often a client who has already rung somebody else.

Watch what happens to an enquiry on a Friday afternoon. It arrives while everyone is on a matter. Nobody picks it up. On Monday somebody does, and by then the person has spoken to two other firms and retained one.
The same thing happens inside a matter. A file sits waiting on identification or a signature, and nothing goes back to the client until a person notices. The delay never shows as a mistake anywhere, which is why it keeps happening in firms that do good work.
The Law Society of New South Wales sets out what a practitioner is responsible for, and none of that changes here: the work is still supervised, still settled and still yours.
Nothing here asks you to change practice management systems. The work happens in the tools your firm already pays for, and the value is in the handoffs between them rather than inside any one of them.

Your practice management system holds the matters, your document store holds the precedents, and your accounting system holds the bills. What none of them does is chase a client on your behalf or start a draft, which is why those still land on a person.
Individually each of those takes a few minutes. Across a full matter list they are the reason the administration happens after hours. The audit maps them in your own systems and puts a number beside each one before anything is built.
It gives no advice and it settles nothing. Every draft is a first draft, read and settled by a practitioner, and nothing goes to a client without a person having read it.

This matters more here than in most industries, because the work carries your practising certificate and your duty to the client. A confident wrong answer in this setting is not an inconvenience, so the line is drawn before anything is built rather than after.
Where the work is genuinely repetitive and written down, it runs. Where it is not, it stops and waits for a person, and every run is logged so it can be read afterwards.
The admin that only happens when somebody remembers goes on a list, and the job costing the most chargeable time comes off it first. The wording gets settled before anything is built, and it runs watched before it runs alone.

The first one is intake, because it is the one standing between an enquiry and a matter. The next starts once that one is running.
Half a morning. What goes out, when, to whom, and what happens when a client answers half of it. Most firms have never had this written down anywhere.
A rough number goes beside each one. Intake usually wins, because everything downstream of it is waiting on it.
Every message goes out in the firm's name, so it gets written the way the firm writes and settled before it exists as anything but words on a page.
Most practice management systems can already tell another system when a matter changes. Nothing gets replaced and nothing gets migrated.
For a fortnight, with a person approving each message before it sends. That fortnight finds the client situations nobody predicted, before a client meets one.
A job is finished when nobody in the firm is thinking about it any more. That is the signal to start the next one, rather than a date on a plan.
Writing down how the admin actually happens takes longer than building it. The first job runs watched inside a fortnight, and each one after it is shorter because the connections already exist.

The first thing a firm notices is that intake stops being somebody's afternoon. What follows is a month where files stop sitting still, because the chasing went out whether or not anyone had time to send it.
Ask where it runs, what happens to matter information, what the firm still has to read, and what you keep if you stop paying. Those four answers separate a build you own from a subscription you rent.

These are worth asking of anybody, including this one, so the answers given here sit under each question.
All of this can also be built in house, and plenty of firms do it well. The six steps above are the same either way.
If you do one thing after reading this, count how many enquiries came in last month and how long each one waited for a first reply. That number is what a first call would ask for. Ask for the free report and it comes back with it.
Related reading from us: the jobs that need remembering, the follow up after every enquiry, AI Receptionist For Lawyers, Google reviews for lawyers and the call nobody leaves a message on.
Intake before a first meeting, first drafts of routine documents, the chasing of anything outstanding, and an acknowledgement to an enquiry that arrives out of hours.
No. It settles nothing and it tells a client nothing about their position. Every draft is a first draft that a practitioner reads and settles.
Matter material stays inside systems the firm controls and is not handed to a public AI tool. The handling is agreed in writing before anything is built.
No. The work is still supervised, still settled and still yours. The automation handles administration and stops before anything that is the practice of law.
No. The build goes around what you already run, connecting your existing systems rather than replacing any of them.
Intake, because everything downstream of it is waiting on it and because it is what stands between an enquiry and a matter.
Yes. It runs on the firm's accounts, in the firm's name, and it keeps running if the arrangement ends. Keeping it working as the software changes is a monthly choice.
One monthly fee covering everything, month to month, with no lock-in contract. What it comes to depends on the firm, so the number gets given on the call.