spareday

For practices doing the chasing after hours

AI automation for accountants: the chasing, done without you.

The unbillable half, handled, and the three things that must never run alone.

★★★★★Australia wide, remote

A report on your own practice, putting a number against each chasing job in a full lodgement period.

Reece Rainer By Reece Rainer spareday, Newcastle NSW Last updated 13 September 2026 Read time 4 minutes
A week of an accounting practice shown as a list with every document request and reminder sent and ticked off
what clients say

What clients say

★★★★★

He was able to take our rough ideas, from concept through to reality. The site has provided an influx of new members, helping to keep our club viable.

Richard Genetgoogle review
★★★★★

A passion-driven, good-hearted and reliable service provider with the competency of a genius when it comes to software engineering, AI technology and marketing.

Daniel Tiwarigoogle review
★★★★★

He created a stunning website for us that captures and nurtures leads with an automated email marketing system, which has filled a huge gap in the business and saved a lot of time (and money!).

Gene Kellygoogle review

See them all on Google

An accounting practice runs on chasing, and none of the chasing is billable.

This is which parts of it can run without a person, what must never be automated in a practice, and the order worth doing it in.

01

The unbillable half of a practice

Between the work a practice bills for and the work it does sits a large amount of following up: documents that have not arrived, signatures outstanding, queries nobody answered, and clients waiting to hear where things are.

A week of routine follow-up shown as a list, with each item sent and ticked off
a week of chasing, and nobody had to remember any of it

None of that requires a qualified person and all of it lands on one. In a small practice the partner ends up doing it, because they are the one who notices, which is the most expensive possible arrangement.

It also concentrates. In February this is background noise. In the last fortnight before a lodgement deadline it is a full-time job somebody is doing on top of their actual work.

The reason it never gets fixed is that no single instance of it is big enough to notice. It is four minutes, thirty times a day, for six weeks, and it only shows up as an exhausted July.

Get my free reportA report on your own practice, putting a number against each chasing job in a full lodgement period.
02

What can run on its own, and what genuinely cannot

The chasing can. Document requests, signature reminders, status updates and onboarding questions all run on rules a practice already follows. Anything requiring judgement about a client's position cannot and should not.

The systems a business already runs shown side by side with the handoffs between them marked
the gaps between systems, which is where a person is still doing the work

The line is clearer in accounting than in most industries, which makes this easier rather than harder. Work goes out under a registered agent, and everything on the wrong side of the line is obviously on the wrong side of it.

What surprises practices is how much sits on the safe side. The document chase alone is usually the largest single block of unbillable time in the year, and it is entirely rule-based.

What runs without a person

  • The document list before a lodgement.

    Out on the same day each period, with reminders continuing until the last item arrives.
  • Signature and engagement chasing.

    Who has signed, who has not, and a reminder to the ones who have not, without anybody assembling the list.
  • Onboarding questions for a new client.

    Structure, software, prior agent, who approves what. Asked and checked before the work starts rather than over a fortnight of emails.
  • The status update clients ring about.

    Where a return is up to, sent before they ring rather than after.
Get my free reportA report on your own practice, putting a number against each chasing job in a full lodgement period.
03

What must never run on its own in a practice

Anything with a number in it, anything that could be read as advice, and anything that goes to the Tax Office. Those three are absolute, and a build that blurs any of them is a liability rather than an efficiency.

An inbox where the routine messages are handled and the ones needing a decision are waiting
what stops, and waits for a person

This is the part worth being careful about because the failure mode is quiet. A wrong reminder is an annoyance. A message that appears to tell a client something about their tax position is a complaint, and it went out under a registered agent's name.

So everything a client can receive is written by the practice and approved before it is built, and anything unexpected stops and waits for a person rather than guessing.

Where it stops, deliberately

  • No advice of any kind.

    Not general, not preliminary. Anything with tax in it is routed to an accountant.
  • Nothing lodged and nothing submitted.

    It chases and it assembles. What goes on a return and when it is lodged stays entirely with the practice.
  • Client data stays inside your systems.

    Nothing is handed to a public AI tool, and what it may read is agreed in writing before anything is built.
Get my free reportA report on your own practice, putting a number against each chasing job in a full lodgement period.
04

How the work actually runs

The chasing gets written down, the job costing the most time goes first, the wording gets approved, it connects to what the practice already runs, and it runs watched for a fortnight before it runs alone.

A month of a business written out as a checklist with each automated job ticked
one at a time, in the order that buys back the most time

The writing down is the slow half and it is the half that gets skipped. Most practices have never put on paper what actually happens when a client sends half the documents, because the answer lives in one person's head.

The connecting is easier than practices expect. Xero, MYOB and every practice management system in use can already tell another system when something happened. Nothing is replaced and nothing is migrated.

The watched fortnight is not a formality. It finds the client situations nobody predicted, and it finds them before a client does.

The order it happens in

  • Write down how the chasing actually works.

    Half a morning, and most of the value is in the conversation itself.
  • Put a number beside each job.

    The pre-lodgement document chase almost always wins, and it wins by a distance.
  • Build one, watch it, then start the next.

    A job is finished when nobody in the practice is thinking about it any more.
Get my free reportA report on your own practice, putting a number against each chasing job in a full lodgement period.

If you do one thing after reading this, write down how many times each client had to be asked for documents last period. That list is the whole business case, and no practice has ever been surprised by how short it made the argument.

Related reading from us: AI Automation Services Australia, AI automation for real estate agents, AI For Accountants, AI receptionist for accountants and written for the person deciding.

Common questions

Does it do any of the accounting?

No. It chases, it assembles and it reports status. It makes no judgement, holds no registration and decides nothing about how a transaction is treated.

Does it lodge anything?

No. What goes on a return and when it is lodged stays entirely with the practice.

Do we have to change ledger software?

No. It goes around what you already run and connects to it rather than replacing anything.

What gets automated first?

The document chase before a lodgement deadline, because it costs the most time and it costs it in the weeks a practice can least afford to lose.

What else we do

See where you stand.
Get a free report on your listing and your website.

Call 0485 017 387
×

Get my free report

See exactly where you rank in every suburb you serve. Takes 60 seconds.

Or send a longer enquiry